Research out of Stanford University suggests that younger folks (under 25) tend to associate happiness with excitement, while those over 50 tend to associate it with calm and serenity, connectedness with others and with the moment. Further, when younger folks practice loving-kindness meditation, they tend to feel more connected to others and to the moment and they also experience happiness in calmness and serenity.
The research design included surveying 12 million blogs for association of the word "happy" with high-arousal or low-arousal words. This result was confirmed both in a survey of adults aged 18-78 and in an experiment in which participants listened to either exciting or a peaceful version of the song "Such Great Heights" and reported how happy they felt. Younger subjects reported feeling happier when listening to the exciting version. Older subjects reported greater happiness when listening to the peaceful version.
Finally, after practicing a loving-kindness meditation for six minutes, younger participants tended to report feeling more connected and in-the-moment than they younger subjects who did not meditate. On the other hand, older subjects who did not meditate were just as connected and in-the-moment as those who did, suggesting that these qualities naturally increase with age. Younger subjects who participated in the meditation defined happiness more as peacefulness than did their peers who did not meditate. In this, they gained a perspective more like that which they would naturally acquire later in life.
Given that we know most folks are not very good at prediciting how much certain experiences will affect their happiness, perhaps one benefit of meditation for younger adults would be an increase in the ability to choose goals that would promote happiness throughout life.
photos: arinsaed by Haeroldus Laudeus, Stillness by h.koppdelaney
The theory that the human brain's size and complexity evolved in response to the need to manage the complexity of group relationships gains more support as reported in this post from Futurepundit. It seems brain size increased most in areas where populations were most dense, with corresponding social complexity.
We are so wired to deal with social relationships that we treat animals and machines as part of our social world. A recent poll found that 86% of American pet owners considered their pet a member of the family. And Byron Reeves and Clifford Nass in The Media Equation have shown how little it takes to get us to treat machines as humans.
Or, as Chris Peterson sums up positive psychology, "Other people matter."
In today's Dilbert cartoon, Scott Adams has the evil Dogbert, CEO, telling his flunky that the company is paying too much in taxes. He demands a physicist and a tax lawyer. In the next frame, sitting with the physicist and lawyer, he says, "I want to incorporate in another dimension." The physicist responds, "Somewhere in the multiverse, it is already done." Dogbert, says, "I like you. The lawyer guy is fired."
Lawyers are often seen as the "No can do" folks. Sometimes, that's ok. Sometimes, the proposed path of action is illegal, or too close to it. Hopefully, sometimes, it is because the path is simply the wrong thing to do. That is to say, hopefully lawyers are also offering counsel on the basis of values, purpose, and goals aligned therewith. We can be clear on the basis of the advice -- legal mandates or ethical, purpose-based considerations -- but when we stand mute on these issues, we forfeit our highest and best role in society. And we lose meaning and purpose in our own lives.
However, we also need to be path-finders as well as nay-sayers. What is the legal and purpose-aligned way forward? To fill this role, lawyers need enough positivity in their lives and relationships to generate creativity, collegiality, and commitment to purpose.
optimism at morenewmath.com:
Love this.
Future expectancy optimism (Carver & Scheier) deals with our expectations as to what percentage of all future possibilities are good things. Someone with high levels of expectancy optimism anticipates lots of good things happening and not many bad things.
Explanatory optimism (Seligman), on the other hand, deals with how we explain good and bad things after they happen. An explanatory pessimist sees the causes of bad things as personal, permanent, and pervasive: "I'm at fault because of the kind of person I am; it's always going to be this way, and it's going to affect everything in my life."
Expectancy optimism and explanatory optimism are only somewhat correlated. In other words, it's possible to be an
June 23, Attorney Well-Being for a Better Society, Napier Looby Bar Association, Nashville, TN
July 10-24, UK-Penn Resilience Programme Training London and Manchester, England
July 26- 28, ACLEA 45th Annual Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
September 2, Chattanooga Bar Association Attorney Well-Being Seminar Chattanooga, TN
October 15-17, ALI-ABA/ACLEA Critical Issume Summit Scottsdale, AZ
Recent Comments